Moin! On May 22, 2008, at 00:54 , Bob Netherton wrote: > Feature, certainly. Annoyance, perhaps at first (like many > parts of SMF), but not a bug. A misunderstand at worst. > I actually spend quite a bit of time on this part in my > SMF class to avoid the misunderstanding. Ok so I fall in that camp. It was a misunderstanding as I see the persistent way that smf does things as default, and didn't bother with the temporary stuff.
[..] > Enable and disable without the -t will also update the value > of the general/enabled property, which is something beyond > just starting and stopping the service. If that's what is > desired then give them the value_authorization in the > general property group. Yes, it will allow them to change > other things in the general property group, but there isn't all > that much that can happen. But it is limited in scope. Ok I did this now for my services and it did work like expected. Thanks a lot for pointing me there. So long -Ralf --- Ralf Weber e: opensolaris at fl1ger.de
