I could swear that I was involved in a discussion about this very thing
a while back. Please change this behavior as you describe below.
Developers and administrators should both be much happier.
-Norm
Liane Praza wrote:
> We're seriously considering changing the behaviour of r.manifest when it
> is invoked on an enabled (and running) service to simply do "svcadm
> disable -s; svccfg delete", rather than failing with an error and
> forcing the administrator to type svcadm disable before removing the
> package.
>
> I expect service developers will be pleased with this, as they'll no
> longer implement this logic in their own packaging scripts. Anyone else
> have any concerns about such a change?
>
> (The IPS folks are planning the same approach for their SMF action.)
>
> liane
> _______________________________________________
> smf-discuss mailing list
> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
