Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: > [ apps re-enabling themselves on upgrade ] > > No, but the entire point of SMF was to fix that. That software seems to > consistently work around that is a serious problem (in developer > documentation and testing, probably, more than anything else).
Yes. We need to educate people who build the components. To a certain extent this involves pounding into their heads that They Are Not In Charge. > While the points about configuration are all well taken, we're not > anywhere near that point with SMF. Right. Hopefully we'll make progress. SMF isn't done. It probably will never be done.