Thanks Dave Dave wrote : > For the same reason ct_ctl_newct() and > ct_ctl_qack() are invalid for > process contracts, a CT_EV_NEGEND (negotation end) > event will never > be generated for a process contract. Therefore > these functions should > always return EINVAL on process contract events. > Dave
> Sushant Nirwan wrote: > > I am testing the functionality of > libcontract.so.1 API's in a > > process contract. When I am going to test function > > ct_event_get_nevid() and ct_event_get_newct() I > come to know from the > > previous thread() that ct_ctl_newtct() and > ct_ctl_qack() are not > > valid for process contract and if the new contract > in not created > > than how we get the result from the > ct_event_get_newct(). > > > > Suggest me the way to test ct_event_get_nevid() and > > ct_event_get_newct() if they are valid for process > contract. This message posted from opensolaris.org
