On 9/16/07, Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> wrote: > * Brandorr <brandorr at opensolaris.org> [2007-09-15 18:03]: > > Maybe "svcadm automatic | manual' (No need to reinvent the wheel, at > > even turn of the road) > > Generally, it's 'svcadm _verb_ svc_fmri'. That is, the subcommand > makes a sentence (except for milestone...).
Understood. Now I don't understand why -t was used, versus start and stop? Anyway, I would like to see it a bit more intuitive than another flag. How about bootenable and bootdisable? (I am not necessarily tied to the word bootenable, just some "verb" that intuitively describes what you are doing. the -t and -p flags are not intuitive start/stop/restart/reload and bootenable/bootdisable are) IE: svcadm bootenable named I would also like to see the following additional states: 1) locked/unlocked (Need to unlock to change) (lock/unlock) (This is more for delegated/shared administration, RBAC would come into play). (This would lock it into it's current state.) This is low priority. -Brian > > - Stephen > > -- > sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ > -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
