David Bustos writes: > Quoth Dan Groves on Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:58:47PM -0500: > > When do you expect the support for marking general/enabled property as > > private to exist? Or, maybe I should first ask do you expect to add > > support for that? > > > David G. Bustos wrote: > > >>I updated the link management document at: > > >> > > >>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/uv/link_id_management.pdf > ... > > Yes, that is what I thought. I will update the document so that we > > state the stop method will kill linkmgmtd, and to also state the user > > should never do this. When we write man pages for linkmgmtd, I'll make > > sure something gets in there to state that networking will not work > > correctly unless linkmgmtd is running, and so the administrator should > > never try to stop the daemon. > > > I'm not sure. I suspect that the "templates" project > ( http://opensolaris.org/os/project/vpanels/templates/ ) will address > the issue, but I don't know how completely. Liane or Tom should be able > to say more, but Liane won't be back until Tuesday. > > > David > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
Dan, Private property data is on our radar screen as a request from the Clearview project, but Liane and I have not yet detailed the mechanism for doing this. I need to read your document to better understand your goals for a private general/enabled. I confess that I have not had time to read it yet. tom
