On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:27:53PM -0500, Dan Groves wrote: > Hi, > > David Bustos wrote: > >Quoth Dan Groves on Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:52:49AM -0500: > >>I posted a new copy of the link ID management API document to: > >> > >>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/uv/link_id_management.pdf > > > >Do you know how this will integrate with NWAM? Isn't NWAM planning on > >putting link configuration onto individual instances, instead of > >property groups on a single instance? > > > > > > We did have a meeting between the Clearview folks and the NWAM folks to > talk about storing the link configuration. If I remember correctly, > Renee, John, and Michael from the NWAM team were there. > > To sum up, we didn't think it made much sense for Clearview to store the > link configuration the way the NWAM folks want to store because of the > different requirements for both projects.
Right, we were looking at it more as a phased set of changes: Clearview/UV would take one step, putting the link-specific properties into the repository; then NWAM would move more stuff in and re-organize a bit. This assumes that we can appropriately label the properties introduced by Clearview/UV as volatile/uncommitted/whatever. Is that a valid assumption? -renee > Also, we didn't think it > would be very difficult to switch from the Clearview way to the NWAM way > once the NWAM folks are at the point where they will write code to store > link configuration. If we're wrong about that (and it will be difficult > to do the conversion), we'd like to know now before we get much more > code written. > > thanks, > Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > smf-discuss mailing list > smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
