No offence taken Liane. The problem with firewalls is that some rules do actually block more than anticipated. It's even more embarrasing when I find this config error after some hours.
My website should now be up and running again. I really like the idea of having svcs -xv showing the content of the log file. Greetings, Peter [Amersfoort, Netherlands] :wq! ------------------------- Peter A. van Gemert Accenture Learning Solaris, Perl Education Specialist Fax +31 (0)33 455 55 99 Mobile +31 (0)6 513 4 11 11 Email peter.van.gemert at accenture.com Aim PeterVolumeGroup >-----Original Message----- >From: smf-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org >[mailto:smf-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of >lianep at eng.sun.com >Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2007 23:50 >To: Menno Lageman >Cc: smf-discuss at opensolaris.org >Subject: Re: [smf-discuss] SMF annoyance > > >(r.e. svclog) > >Menno Lageman writes: >> The OP wrote that script and is now trying to get in into >OpenSolaris. >> The bug he filed on b.o.o last week (6530523) has the >'submitter wants >> to work on bug set' to yes. > >Ack! So sorry for missing this connection with Peter's mail >on request-sponsor. My apologies, Peter! (Also, I went to >unhide the page I made for 'SMF utilities', but noticed that I >can't currently reach http://www2.petervg.nl/software. Once I >can, I'll unhide the page which contains the link to your software.) > >The original plan in this area was to not only show the >service log, but actually just show the important parts (since >we can calculate when the service started failing and display >messages from that point on). > >I'd propose putting this functionality in svcs -xv. If the >service was failing/failed, we'd show the logfile from the >point that the failure started by recording the file offset of >the point where the failure began occurring. > >If there's no failure, we'd show the logfile since the start >of the last method executed. > >(This is also all part of a grand scheme to display more >unified service history, but I feel that adding this component >alone to svcs -xv now wouldn't compromise the vision.) > >liane >-- >Liane Praza, Solaris Kernel Development >liane.praza at sun.com - http://blogs.sun.com/lianep > > >_______________________________________________ >smf-discuss mailing list >smf-discuss at opensolaris.org > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
