Jens Elkner writes:
> > In general, it's a losing proposition for inetconv to be attempting to 
> > divine the meaning of random service commands.
> 
> Yes, and that's why it should not even try to think but just convert the
> appropriate lines as is and thus in a predictable manner!

Preserving command line arguments within the start method as part of
the import process seems like an perfectly reasonable request to me.
And it sure sounds like a bug if the current tool doesn't manage at
least that.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to