On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:48:19PM -0500, Dave Miner wrote: > Actually, I'm not sure it really matters now that I think about it. I > think the way you'd want to do this is to have three new types of > entries in the pkgmap: > > - abandon (I'm dropping this file, but some other package is picking it > up, so leave it in place, just remove my reference to it in contents) > - adopt (the other half of the above) > - delete (remove the file) > > The abandon/adopt doesn't have to happen in one transaction (which is > probably easier to implement in pkgadd anyway).
Yes, I see. And as long as the delete doesn't delete the file if it's owned by a different pkg then this would be a fire-n-forget deal. I like that. Nico --