Liane Praza writes: > Liane Praza wrote: > > Tom Whitten wrote: > >> We would like to request sponsorship by the Service Management Facility > >> Community for a new project called the SMF Early Manifest Import > >> Project or > >> EMI Project. > > > > +1 > > > > Also, as facilitator, I'll note: > > > > - There are 3 +1s so far, and no -1s to project creation. 5 days have > > already passed for commentary, so let's close voting in 24 hours. > > Ok, with the same status now as when I sent this note, this project is > officially sponsored. > > But... > > > > > - I know there was a moratorium on project creation at some point due to > > the website transition. I don't know if we're in that moratorium > > period now. I'll let you guys know once I figure it out. If we are, > > we'll work out another location for your repository in the meantime. > > Yes, we're currently in project creation moratorium, so a normal project > space can't be setup. > > I propose the following: > - All members are[1] Core Contributors to the SMF community. That means > you can create any necessary webpages directly on the community website > for now. > > - I'll create you a mercurial repo as part of the smf-doc project, since > only projects can host repos. If you all add yourselves as participants > of that project, I can then grant you all access rights to the repo. > > - Do you need a separate mailing list or will you be doing your work on > smf-discuss? If you need a separate mailing list, let me know and I can > pester the website-discuss folks about that too. (Or you can if you don't > want to risk lag time due to me.) > > If the project hasn't integrated once the website transition and project > creation moratorium are complete, we can talk about whether you guys want > a Real Project of your own or not. > > OK? > > liane > [1] Well, are supposed to be, based on the last time we voted about > membership. There seems to be a loss of that recording for Tom and Sean > right now in the auth database, but I have mail out to website-discuss to > get that remedied.
We discussed this in our team meeting, today. It sounds like a good approach. We don't need a separate opensolaris mailing list. smf-discuss is sufficient. tom
