On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:01:23PM -0800, Jordan Brown wrote: > Tony Nguyen wrote: > >Indeed. Does it make sense for Solaris to establish a new policy, a > >directory tree under /, for delivery of non-configuration files? > > "lib" directories in various places - /usr/lib, /usr/share/lib, /lib - have > long been used not only for library files per se but also for files that > contain static data that is not directly executable. That's perhaps not an > ideal division, but it's got enough history (and few enough problems) that > I don't think it'd be worthwhile to try to break it apart at this point.
Also, updating to filesystem(5) to add new top-level dirnames is probably a non-starter. Just use /lib.
