I'll take a look.

-tn

On 01/28/10 01:33 PM, Michael Corcoran wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for a couple of reviewers to review the smf related changes
> for the Intel CPU/Memory hot add project since we're not experts in this
> area :)
>
> I'd like to get the following files reviewed:
>
> usr/src/cmd/acpihpd/acpihpd.xml
> usr/src/cmd/acpihpd/svc-acpihpd
> usr/src/cmd/svc/profile/platform_i86pc.xml
>
> It'd also be great if you could look at the implementation of the daemon
> that it is trying to start to make sure it handles the daemon exiting
> correctly.  The internals of what the daemon does are irrelevant in this
> case :)
>
> usr/src/cmd/acpihpd/acpihpd.c
>
> The daemon should be running on any system which supports this new hot
> add capability and by default will run on all x86 platforms and disable
> itself if the platform does not support this feature.
>
> I'd like to make sure that we're following secure by default and that we
> have limited privileges correctly.  We must run as root as we're
> dependent upon syseventd which requires this.
>
> The webrev is at:
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mec/smf_review/
>
> I only included the acpihpd makefiles in case anyone is interested, but
> don't need to have those reviewed/
>
> If you'd like to see this in the context of the larger changes, let me
> know and I can point you at a webrev of that as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> smf-discuss mailing list
> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org

Reply via email to