Shawn Walker wrote: > On 03/16/10 02:05 PM, James Carlson wrote: >> I mostly agree, but as I understand the original goal of SMF, it was >> expected that most non-trivial subsystems would end up getting >> customized interfaces to deal with the complications of user >> presentation rather than forcing users into svccfg. Perhaps that's no >> longer a goal ... > > Isn't this what visual panels is for? >
Likely so ... but then what becomes of the command line environment that many (most? all?) system administrators use? That's why I said that "perhaps" it's just no longer a goal. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj at workingcode.com>
