On 03/18/10 10:16 AM, Sean Wilcox wrote:
> On 03/17/10 04:23 PM, Sean Wilcox wrote:
>> A couple of comments on the notes below...
>>
>> On 03/17/10 03:58 PM, Antonello Cruz wrote:
>>> Please find my feedback for usr/src/cmd/svc/milestone/manifest-import
>>> below.
>>>
>>> usr/src/cmd/svc/milestone/manifest-import
>>>     61: if you are looking for the prorpety manifestfile, why not
>>>         simplify by doing
>>>
>>>         smfmfiles=`/usr/bin/svcprop smf/manifest | \
>>>             awk '/\/manifestfile / {print $3}' | grep '^/lib'`
>>>
>>>         You could probably make awk match the '^/lib' in the same
>>>         command, but you'd have to ask barts how to do it ;-)
>>>
>>>         Additionally, why are you using egrep at the end of the pipe in
>>>         the original code?
>>>
>>>     64: we can use a similar simplification as above
>>>
>>     64: we can use a similar simplification as above
>>
>> Not sure I remember why we used egrep there... but can definitely 
>> make the
>> change to the awk to get the manifestfile keyword.  As I look at this 
>> what
>> about a case where a manifest file is named something like 
>> foo_manifestfile.xml
>> could that trip this up?  Need to investigate this and harden this 
>> code section
>> a bit.
>>
>>
>
> I did  a bit of playing around with this, this morning it looks like 
> the simplification could be the following :
>
> function cleanup_needwork {
>         if [ "$early" == true ]; then
>                 smfmfiles=`/usr/bin/svcprop smf/manifest | \
>                     awk '(/^lib_/) && (/\/manifestfile /) {print $3}'`
>         else
>                 smfmfiles=`/usr/bin/svcprop smf/manifest |  \
>                     awk '/\/manifestfile / {print $3}'`
>         fi
>
>         nw=`/lib/svc/bin/mfstscan $smfmfiles 2>&1 1>/dev/null`
>         [ "$nw" ] && return 1
>
>         return 0
> }
>
> And checking for the specific property with the '/manifestfile ' makes 
> sure we get the right thing.  Unless anybody can
> see any holes I'll update the code.
>
>
Looks fine to me.

-tn

Reply via email to