I've been using smokeping for a while and it's great for monitoring
latency/packetloss around a large network. Recently I was asked to monitor a
bunch of hosts with two different sizes of packet. I couldn't find a neat
way of doing this with the current smokeping configuration scheme. I
eventually copied FPing.pm to FPing2.pm and wrote a config like this.

        *** Probes ***

        + FPing

        binary = /sbin/fping
        packetsize = 50

        + FPing2

        binary = /sbin/fping
        packetsize = 1480

But I didn't feel good about copying perl modules around to do it. I was
hoping I could have written something like

        *** Probes ***

        + SmallPing

        module = FPing
        binary = /sbin/fping
        packetsize = 50

        + LargePing

        module = FPing
        binary = /sbin/fping
        packetsize = 1480

In other words, make the probe name (SmallPing) independent of the module
that supplies the functionality (FPing.pm).

Would this be a sensible modification to make for the smokeping
distribution? It seems to be a simple enough change to the code.

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/smokeping-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

Reply via email to