Today Leigh Sharpe wrote: > Hi guys, Can't quite seem to work this one out. Is there any way > of reporting the 'avg loss' as a percentage? It would be much > more useful (and readable by the boss) than the per-20-packets > reading.
sure this would be hackable ... but I find it sort of strange to give a percentage for so few packets ... if we sent 1000 packets then % would seem natural to me ... but when we send 20 things would be in 5% steps anyway ... anyone ... what do you think ... would % help the readability of the graph ? cheers tobi > > Regards, > Leigh > > Leigh Sharpe > Network Systems Engineer > Pacific Wireless > Ph 9584 8966 > Mob 0408 009 502 > email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web www.pacificwireless.com.au > > > -- > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/smokeping-users > WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi > -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, ETZ J97, ETH, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland / // _ \/ _ \/ / phoneto:+41(0)1-632-5286 faxto:+41(0)1-632-1517 /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://google.com/search?q=tobi -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/smokeping-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
