Today Stefan Michel wrote: > Hi Ron! > > 11.03.2003 23:15:24, "Ron E. Jager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >i've mentioned this issue b/f in the past and now i seem to have pinpointed > >the problem. when running smokeping against all our nodes, if we get a > >sudden loss i will get a match for "lossdetect" as a notification in my > >email but then it shuts down the graphing completely. i have to restart the > >smokeping daemon to get the graphing back. > >-ron > > Same here. I disabled email notification completely, else I would lose data > from the point of notification until I restarted the daemon. This issue is > reproducible and leaves no traces in logfiles whatsoever. Strange behavior: > if (let's say) 3 machines on a certain network produce a lossdetect warning, > I might even get three emails (if this happens quite at the same time), so > the daemon does not die after sending the *first* email, it seems to die > shortly after reporting that incident...
Dear Ron and Stefan, I just had a quick look over the code, I can not fathom why this should be ... I am using the Alert mechanism here in my installation and it works nice without any deaths ... I am running with Solaris and perl 5.6.1 cheers tobi > Regards, > Stefan > > (System is a RH Linux box with a permanent internet connection and postfix) > > > > > -- > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/smokeping-users > WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi > -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, ETZ J97, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland / // _ \/ _ \/ / System Manager Coach Time Lord Developer Designer /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker +41(0)1-632-5286 -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/smokeping-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
