Honest! I wasn't trying to make trouble! :) I just wanted to make sure my understanding was correct. I reckon it isn't a limitation as long as the application knows to access _table rather than a hash.
The reason I was curious is that the DESCRIPTION at http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/realmen/down/data/ParseConfig.html shows what looks like a section of hosts where the pointer to the array has the same names as the contents of first column. But I may not have understood relationship between the input and the output. Dan -----Original Message----- Today Dan McGinn-Combs wrote: > I noticed that there was apparently only one > array called _table field permitted by the parser per section. Is this > true? yes this is true ... how should the parser distinguisch between different tables ? *** section *** a b c 1 2 3 g k 1 1 how about this ? *** another *** +table1 l n p 2 3 4 +table2 g k 1 1 -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/smokeping-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
