Ahh.. Yes so I invoked --morning instead and it does appear to use mutt, but mutt bypassed the SMTP_AUTH portion so the server rejects the connection... It DID use the alternate SMTP Port though, so it's something in the mutt backend it would seem now.. Interesting. Thanks!
-----Original Message----- From: Niko Tyni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:09 PM To: Fraser, Ian [CAR:W669:EXCH] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smokeping-users] Using mutt rather than Sendmail? On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 11:36:32AM -0500, Ian Fraser wrote: > Is it possible to have smokeping send email using mutt instead of > sendmail ? I've modified the config to point sendmail=/usr/bin/mutt > but when I run tSmoke --testmail I see nothing going to the SMTP > server (I should shouldn't I ?) Hi, I suppose mutt should work, if it supports sendmail-style options. Smokeping calls sendmail as # <sendmail-program> -f <from-address> <to-address> so there's nothing fancy there. The tSmoke '--testmail' option is unfortunately misnamed. It apparently doesn't really send anything, just tells where the mail would go. I think I'll fix this for the next release. Meanwhile, I guess you can test with eg. '--morning' just as well. Cheers, -- Niko -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/smokeping-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
