Tobias Oetiker wrote: > yes .. Config::Grammar ... still confused by the name change ...
Ah, right. > Config::Grammar does not use xml out of respect for humans who edit > config files ... xml is good for parsers not for humans ... Yeah, tell me about it - this is self inflicted pain :-( > in any event, the config ability would have to be integrated into > config::grammar, so there is no issue with parsing, and the xml or > not question becomes irrelevant at that level ... Indeed - food for thought. Thanks, Craig -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/smokeping-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
