It appears my "unreachable" rate is less than 4%. So getting multiple probes configured appears to be a higher priority than cleaning the data.
Thanks, Scott On Nov 14, 2007 2:34 PM, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right now I'm using a single FPing probe for all of my devices. We > have a lot of them, and many do not reply, but a "clean up" of the > data is not really an available option at this time. We have a step > of 300 secs and it's beginning to occasionally take more than 300 secs > to complete. In this instance, can I setup multiple FPing probes > (e.g. FPing1, FPing2, etc) and verify concurrentprobes is "yes" (which > I believe is the default)? Is this going to do what I'm thinking it > will, which is running several FPing probes in parallel? > > Our config file is automatically generated from a mgmt system. Could > I have the mgmt system output the config with random (or sequentially > changing) probe=FPing* entries? Or is there a better methodology for > distributing the probes among the devices? > > Thanks, > Scott > _______________________________________________ smokeping-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users
