Hi,

i droped idea of dinamically connecting/disconnecting of modems cus it
looks like it dosnt work.

No I try add 3 gateway to service and then starts it. This time it
works only with CONCURRENT_GATEWAY_START = false;
With CONCURRENT_GATEWAY_START = true; I find in logs following:

11:22:01,322 | INFO  | Thread-14 | smslib | GTW: 1: Starting gateway,
using Siemens MC35i AT Handler.
11:22:01,322 | INFO  | Thread-14 | smslib | GTW: 1: Opening: COM10
@115200
11:22:01,329 | DEBUG | DelayQueueManager | smslib | Running...
11:22:01,329 | DEBUG | DelayQueueManager | smslib | DelayQueueManager
running...
11:22:01,333 | INFO  | Thread-13 | smslib | GTW: 0: Starting gateway,
using Siemens MC35i AT Handler.
11:22:01,333 | INFO  | Thread-13 | smslib | GTW: 0: Opening: COM9
@115200
11:22:01,334 | INFO  | Thread-15 | smslib | GTW: 2: Starting gateway,
using Siemens MC35i AT Handler.
11:22:01,334 | INFO  | Thread-15 | smslib | GTW: 2: Opening: COM11
@115200
11:22:02,705 | INFO  | Thread-15 | smslib | GTW: 2: Closing: COM11
@115200

...

11:15:26,921 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 0: Closing: COM9
@115200
11:15:26,921 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 0: Gateway stopped.
11:15:26,921 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 1: Stopping gateway...
11:15:26,934 | INFO  | Thread-15 | smslib | GTW: 0: Closing: COM9
@115200
11:15:26,943 | DEBUG | NotifyQueueManager | smslib | Running...
11:15:26,943 | DEBUG | NotifyQueueManager | smslib |
NotifyQueueManager running...
11:15:26,943 | DEBUG | NotifyQueueManager | smslib |
NotifyQueueManager end...
11:15:26,987 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 1: Closing: COM10
@115200
11:15:26,987 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 1: Gateway stopped.
11:15:26,987 | INFO  | Thread-16 | smslib | GTW: 1: Closing: COM10
@115200
11:15:26,987 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 2: Stopping gateway...
11:15:26,987 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 2: Closing: COM11
@115200
11:15:26,987 | INFO  | Thread-8 | smslib | GTW: 2: Gateway stopped.

it looks like watchdog close service automatically.

Can somebody explain it to me?

G.

Pancypir
On 22 Lis, 08:08, Nizam Mohideen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Use one Service. Add multiple SerialModemGateways (with different ports) to
> it. Then start the service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Karol Pancypir <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I am completely new in SMSLib, and after few tests I need some help;
>
> > I have 3 modems of Siemens MC35i connected over RS232<>USB converter
> > to PC. In some loop i start first modem with
> > Service.startService(true);
>
> > then I stops it with Service.stopService(); I add a next modem and
> > start service again. Unfortunately already in second loop i get
> > runtime error and in log i see that second modem hangs up on SEND :AT
> > +CNMI=?(cr) command while start up.
>
> > I try set CONCURRENT_GATEWAY_START = false; but without result.
> > Although some constellation (when only 2 modems are connected) I can
> > start service. So Im confused now if its hardware/RS232/USB driver or
> > something else.
>
> > Second thing is the main approach how to use many modems at once; in
> > my test application I create for every gateway a separate thread and
> > then manage the outgoing messages with some BlockingQueue. It is
> > really necessary to create thread for every gateway? If yes, is method
> > Service.sendMessage() thread safe?
>
> > Regards
> > Pancypir
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "SMSLib Discussion Group" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SMSLib Discussion Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en.

Reply via email to