Serial-USB-Serial conversion is better avoided if possible. If going for 
the USB option make sure you have enough USB ports on the server itself 
without having to introduce a USB hub. I've tried many hubs and all of them 
ended up causing frequent port lockups on Windows.

On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:56:35 PM UTC+5:30, MaxX wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer ...
>
> I have 2 modems each one in an USB port
> i've been testing different setups with my USBs ports to try to find best 
> setup. After your email I thougt that if I put them in different ports / 
> motherboards hubs will make any difference. but it didn't
>
> 1st question that I have now is if serial modems will make any difference. 
> I plan to buy a 8 port modem pool and I can't decide if to buy USB or RS232 
> ( via multiserial board )
>
> 2nd one is actually an ideea ... to create a QueueManger thread for each 
> gateway and eventually have 10 paralel threads for 10 modems ending with 
> the possibility to send independently SMS via 2 modems (almost) at the same 
> time
>
> Not sure how QueueManger  is implemented now ... I'll dig into it
>
> Regards,
> Marius
>
>
>
> On Saturday, July 28, 2012 12:06:19 PM UTC+3, T.Delenikas wrote:
>>
>> Well, I tried to find something (like a recent change in code, perhaps) 
>> that could justify this, with no luck.
>> On the other hand, this issue has been reported again recently, so 
>> something is really going on here...
>>
>> The really bad thing is that I currently don't have access to a 
>> multi-serial board in order to test things.
>> I've seen that USB hubs (or maybe their drivers?) sometimes appear as if 
>> they lock concurrent port access. I am not the most appropriate person to 
>> follow low-level specs and controller capabilities, but I've seen articles 
>> like this:  
>> http://www.avsforum.com/t/1277379/recommendation-please-most-reliable-self-powered-7-port-usb-hub
>>   
>> which suggest that low-level hubs may indeed have a problem allowing 
>> concurrent access to all ports. I've seen terms like " *Supports 4 
>> Concurrent Non-periodic Transactions* ". I guess that all of these 
>> references have something to do with the hub's ability to allow concurrent 
>> port access and how many individual controllers they have (i.e. ports per 
>> controller ration). Do you or anybody else know something about it???
>>
>> Needless to say that such hubs have a cost of $50 - $100 + - check this 
>> one:  http://www.cooldrives.com/12poinusb20h.html and have nothing to do 
>> with the $10 hubs found in every stupid accessory store...
>>
>> On Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:54:21 PM UTC+3, MaxX wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> modems via USB ... 
>>> pl2303: Prolific PL2303 USB to serial adaptor driver
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SMSLib Discussion Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/smslib/-/8DcyqEQyHdUJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


  • [smslib] Sending SMS in p... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of MaxX
    • [smslib] Re: Sending... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of T.Delenikas
      • [smslib] Re: Sen... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of MaxX
        • [smslib] Re:... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of T.Delenikas
          • [smslib]... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of MaxX
            • [sm... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Nizam
              • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of MaxX
                • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Nizam
                • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of MaxX
                • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Nizam
                • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of MaxX
                • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Nizam

Reply via email to