On 31/08/16 09:05, Benjamin M Romer wrote: > What I had in mind here are applications similar to BOINC, where the > data to be processed is downloaded from outside and shouldn't be > processed under the management application's security model. The > download area could be opened using the content interface, with each > client project inside its own snap for isolation. > > This approach could also be used by services like mail spools and > message or print queues, or services that work like FTP or Wordpress, > where files are uploaded but need to be accessible to plug-ins or > other services (like DLNA for a media server, or HTTP, or ClamAV).
Yes, I think it makes sense to have shared writable content, just not the ENTIRETY of the shared writable content. But that's a niggle. Keep shining :) Mark -- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
