+1 On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Leo Arias <leo.ar...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Nice! > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Victor Palau <victor.pa...@canonical.com > > wrote: > >> Overall, seems like it would be good practice that if a snap publishes a >> service to a port, that: >> >> - the port can be easily changed >> - the snap can be updated told that it will be proxy-ed, and work well >> >> I would add this one: To easily print which port is being used > https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1608572. > Ideally for me, when the service is installed it should print the URL to > access it. >
-- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
