Le 25/11/2016 à 18:09, Gustavo Niemeyer a écrit : > The role of xdg-open itself is already to open the URL with whatever > tooling is available, so it sounds like we're making the issue more > complex than it ought to be. > > I think we should reimplement xdg-open in terms of snapctl, and have > snapd itself doing the hand-over to the local xdg-open tool after some > basic sanity checking on the URL. That way we're not really asking for > anything from the local system (no dbus service) while remaining > completely portable. > Ah, that was my fist implementation proposal which wasn't accepted at the time. Happy to see that our view converge now
Gustavo, do you mind opening a bug for tracking this (and we can reference people who want to help/contribute to it) as it would be an easy first snapd contribution for newcomers? Cheers, Didier
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
