Thank you very much, now it's clearer than before. Regards, Bruno
2017-02-02 11:32 GMT+01:00 Mark Shuttleworth <[email protected]>: > On 02/02/17 10:27, Oliver Grawert wrote: > > hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2017, 10:01 +0100 schrieb Ara Pulido: > >> > >> Your device is trying to get a serial assertion from the Ubuntu > >> servers, but your model is not one of the Ubuntu official ones, so > >> that is not possible. > > AFAIK it is possible if both, gadget and kernel snaps are in the store > > and signed by the same key that was used by the model assertion (i.e. > > owned by the same user). at least that is my experience with the > > beaglebone black image that i produce. > > Am not sure what's causing the specific issue you see, but Ogra is > describing the expected behaviour, which is that you can push a kernel > and gadget snap and then your own model assertion which binds those > together and is the basis for the image builder. > > We are working with the hardware companies to ensure that building a > kernel snap is trivial for their hardware. Certified board will have > official kernel snaps that anybody can "just use". Of course, if you > want to modify the kernel for an official board you can also just build > your own kernel snap. > > I know there is some work outstanding to get all of those pieces > working. There are some tricky corner cases (for example, what if you > want to change kernel snap entirely by issuing a new revision of your > model-assertion?) but it shouldn't be long before everything is in place > to enable all of that for straightforward cases. > > Mark > > > -- > Snapcraft mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/snapcraft > >
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
