On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:25 -0800, Kyle Fazzari wrote: > > On 02/06/2017 09:21 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2017-02-05 at 08:04 +0800, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > > > > > > Hi Oli, > > > > > > Does it mean all of the snaps have the same /tmp or each snap has its own > > > /tmp? I am a little bit confused about this. > > > > > You might be confused because the behavior changed. For a long time, each > > snap > > *command* had its own /tmp directory. That was changed late last year so > > that > > all commands with the same snap share the same /tmp directory such that each > > snap has its own /tmp directory. > This is good to know, I thought each command *still* had its own /tmp. > Any chance you know the snapd version in which this change was introduced? >
It looks like it was fixed in upstream (pre-merge with snapd) snap-confine 1.0.41. It didn't make it into series 16 until 1.0.43-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 until Oct 10[1]. [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snap-confine/+bug/1630040 -- Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
