On 02/09/2017 12:02 PM, Alan Pope wrote: > Hi Kyle (and Sergio!) > > On 9 February 2017 at 18:45, Kyle Fazzari <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you find yourself using cleanbuild a lot (it makes a new ephemeral >> container, builds, then destroys the container), you might find some >> workflow improvements by simply developing the snap in a container. You >> can even bind-mount the source from the host, if you want. This is the >> workflow I use personally. It allows for one to fully customize the apt >> sources while also utilizing Snapcraft's built-in stage package cache*, >> and it doesn't clutter the development environment on the host. >> >> * In snapcraft 2.27, coming early next week >> > > You guys! I love reading these teases of what's coming in the next > snapcraft. Your fast iterating and understanding of user requirements > is making snapcraft a real pleasurable tool to use on a daily basis. > Thank you!
Well thanks Alan! That's nice to hear :) . -- Kyle Fazzari (kyrofa) Software Engineer Canonical Ltd. [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
