Hi John, Thanks. Just now, I tried with confinement: devmode, but I could still install without "--devmode". It does not complain anything there :). The result was that the app ran in confined mode.
Thanks & best regards, XiaoGuo On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, John Lenton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 July 2016 at 03:11, XiaoGuo Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I use "--devmode" when installing a snap application, do I have to > define > > "confinement" in snapcraft.yaml to be ""devmode" exactly. What happens > if I > > defined "confinement" to be "strict"? > > while --devmode is required for snaps that have confinement:devmode, > it can also be specified for confinement:strict, in which case you'll > have a non-confined (and soon non-auto-updating) snap that could be > confined. Useful if you're seeing weird behaviour in the snap and > wondering if it's because of a confinement bug, but not for much > otherwise. > > The reverse is not true; if you have confinement:devmode and you don't > specify --devmode (or, in 2.11, override it with --jailmode), you'll > get an error telling you as much. > > HTH, > -- XiaoGuo, Liu (刘晓国） Mobile: +86-13911181302
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
