Why would the manifest carry the approved alias? This sounds like out-of-band information.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Martin Albisetti < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would again suggest just an alias: apache resolves to apache.guy, or to > > apache.tribe, or to apache.canonical (ignoring the syntax, which I'd > still > > prefer to change). > > > > If the best option changes over time, the alias simply points to > something > > else. There's no convoluted scheme to migrate from one option to the > next, > > and no intrinsic conflicts. > > > > Am I missing something with that proposal? > > I don't think you are, it is in essence what I proposed as well. > The package continues to have it's name, and the alias is provided > separately and accessible both in searches and in the command line. > The manifest carries both, the unique name and approved alias. > > > -- > Martin > -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
-- snappy-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
