On 03/31/2015 02:44 PM, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Jamie Strandboge <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We've discussed frameworks quite a bit but we've yet to provide a definition, >> how they will be used on snappy, how they work with the store and how >> they extend security policy. This email attempts to address this (I expect >> there >> to be some fine-tuning but I think it is in good enough shape for wider >> comment). > > I'm a bit embarrassed on how late I am to this party. Thanks for > putting this together, it's great to see it consolidated in one place. > > I'd like to add one propose property: frameworks can't depend on other > frameworks. > Otherwise I think we'll very quickly have re-invented apt dependencies > along with all their problems. > It'll also force them to be generally self-contained and with a more > concrete purpose. > This was always the understanding, but it wasn't captured. Thanks!
> (I do think an app can depend on multiple frameworks, though, just > keep a flat level of dependencies) > yes -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- snappy-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
