On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Loïc Minier <[email protected]> wrote: > Snappy shell needs not be required for all snappy based images and/or needs > not be on port 22, it is rather an optional interface to snappy, much like > webdm is an useful tool and default web user experience. (Perhaps it should > be implemented as a completely separate addon, but it felt more natural to > tie it to the main command-line tool.) Perhaps we'll have a snappy router > image where it makes sense to make this shell the default, with or without > direct shell access enabled, while a snappy media-center image would not > have it.
What if it worked more like a database client, like mysql or psql? You run the "snappy connect ubuntu@host" locally, and the binary runs locally, sending commands and receiving responses to the target host over SSL. That seems cleaner, and nicer than running a shell on the host. Dustin Kirkland Canonical, Ltd. -- snappy-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
