Hi Leo, Gerrit is a much better reviewing tool, which we'll likely migrate to eventually if GitHub doesn't evolve in time. That said, it doesn't fix any breakages by itself.
As we discussed before, the problem we have is not where we review, but who merges, which tests are being run before that happens, and when do they run. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Leo Arias <leo.ar...@canonical.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > What do you people think about gerrit? > > Today Federico mentioned gerrithub and zuul, which together would have > prevented some of the breakages we have made. > > pura vida > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW1cvVAAoJEIUvYw0No8DgY20QAIb4ofs1iC6jeD4rUIf2pIE+ > +7B50p4lVs+YU08bhTCEp7FCdy7i0XPmroF3FKMBqr+XX9jlv8yxaHQQ6OxiuCNx > ydcK11tRKUX/QlX9hAvgGMbnUV4lXzSQVAlssQkZOGIuz4ulIcW+g4c9ETbqS5Xc > 75g0g51md/DD3ZiXWEJeNcbNfTrOdUZbdxZl+yCr1qj7UZL3A3r5YLBSDioZKXPO > 6kvMT9QWpuS5ynnHiEdGgyWkZ38/8eHyVj2XULa7zLKK0wk/9uGlL+4WnVOeGRJE > uscw611zMckis9Or0+fo8v8SHmt8rp3Gbsdn1Rz5ijNGZu2GTFcNyH1zJTNMXQAO > tK76Vv0d4w8J9TOUAn425GA1sBNiPTikyR4gG2U19Q1TUkehJpusRdG79qy5Rm+I > 73n5umGv335aN0ixtIL5OW9y4S7QYAfL8t74lU9ljzP6vmgMsQiF7RGf0Ceq7J+o > Cctm90plHkEUIVSheyCmzZ7ip86ZM2XMbpLJ43nZlubCIylZRkNCetGx3qv+n8w0 > 8m0L1vcmu1VR3NTcksbRBUMbNo4LVjBHN+xqVaabSHJpe7lxrYVOOqCCoyb2KY2a > xN8XEnzq/O9uN/d5l6FR3WUss/xsmNZijOdZZwUJQR/qOcZIg8JcbNLNEa12PU/7 > potEULaMYiKBOz3FHE79 > =jfbO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > snappy-devel mailing list > snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel > -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
-- snappy-devel mailing list snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
