I really like the second approach because it makes everything work by convention and is actually quite simple conceptually.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer <gustavo.nieme...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Today while sorting out some internal details of the on-going interfaces > work with Zygmunt, the conversation and code review ended up reaching > ubuntu-core-launcher and its parameters. > > The following document describes the issue, and presents two different > proposals for how to address it. The primary is straightforward, and the > secondary is better but takes more work. The recommendation is going with > the primary now, and implement the secondary one once we have more time > available. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nO6nT8S20q6FUg7Qt2K7qGPxWr8sPEkZZ-4cFTUytfI > > Please let us know what you think. > > > gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net > > -- > snappy-devel mailing list > snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel > -- snappy-devel mailing list snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
