On 03/23/2016 07:45 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 23/03/16 11:40, Kyle Fazzari wrote: >> Huh, that's an interesting idea. Yeah, if such a thing is possible it >> does indeed solve the use-cases I've seen. I feel like this should be >> more gadget-layer (my device with these snaps preinstalled will need a >> little swap) versus application-layer (my snap needs more memory than >> you have), but it solves the problem. > > Yes, all of this would be controlled by the gadget snap working with the > os snap.
Alright, thanks Mark! -- Kyle Fazzari (kyrofa) Software Engineer Canonical Ltd. k...@canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- snappy-devel mailing list snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
