You
highlighted my words, ( They are weak from the circumstances of their
marriage so if someone shows them a little attention they are weak and
will give in. (and alot of times feel like crap about it later)) and then
said that I said thought men were weak. Not all men are weak. Every marriage is
different and all the circumstances are different. I said though, those men due
to the circumstances of their marriage can be weak and give in when shown the
affection and attention they want and crave. I am far from a man hater and I
dont think anywhere in any of my posts have I shown anything that would make
others think I am a man hater
-----Original Message-----In a message dated 9/27/2003 7:59:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 8:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Pick one (immorality glamorized)
You are twisting my words. Not all men are weak. I'm saying the men whose wives treat them like shit, belittle them, withold sex from them and show them no love whatsoever can sometimes be weak and give in to those temptations. No one is perfect and given the right circumstances will give in. I dont mind arguing this but dont twist my words around.
i didnt twist your words i highlighted your words. and that comment was aimed at charles. i was mistreated for years besides the cheating that i didnt find out about until later and i never cheated on him and if i had it wouldnt have been his fault it would have been mine for cheating on him and choosing to break my vow. and in the end he'll have to answer for it not me
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
