You may leave
me out of it. I explained what I intended by my comment, in two separate
onlist posts. I further explained no offense was intended and made a public
apology for causing offence. I don’t intend to explain myself again.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Harder
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003
10:42 PM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Pick one
(immorality glamorized)
What did Charles say? in this instance? I know, but he is not in this post....
Tim
On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 07:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In
a message dated 9/27/2003 8:12:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You
highlighted my words, ( They are weak from
the circumstances of their marriage so if someone shows them a little attention they are weak and will give in.
(and alot of times feel like crap about it later)) and then said that I said
thought men were weak. Not all men are weak. Every marriage is different and
all the circumstances are different. I said though, those men due to the
circumstances of their marriage can be weak and give in when shown the
affection and attention they want and crave. I am far from a man hater and I
dont think anywhere in any of my posts have I shown anything that would make
others think I am a man hater
yep
makes almost as much sense as being called a manhater when you are saying they
should be strong enough to make their own choices huh
charles? :)))))))
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
