RE: [Sndbox] Pick one (immorality glamorized)

[Charles]

See, for me, instigation would be a mitigating circumstance.  I would forgive her more easily if she wasn’t the instigator.   Charles Mims http://www.the-sandbox.org   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jen -- Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:04 PM To: The Sandbox Discussion List Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Pick one (immorality glamorized)   For me personally, instigation does not have anything to do with it. It doesnt change what happened, and it does not change the fact that he was in agreement to go outside of the marriage. ----- Original Message ----- From: Lowell R. Matthews To: The Sandbox Discussion List Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:58 PM Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Pick one (immorality glamorized)   Jackie answered me:   ...we werent talking about anger we were talking about responsibility and if they slept together no matter how much jen tried to seduce him if he says yes he chose that and its his responsibility for his choice   shed be responsible for what she did but not for what he did Okay, I agree that she is responsible for what she did (i.e., fornication) and he is responsible for what he did (i.e., adultery).  However, if she is the instigator of the affair (in this case, or in other cases of bad actions all the way up to and including murder), then I believe that she also bears responsibility for that action.  Do you simply disagree or is instigation outside the scope of the argument? Best wishes, Lowell   ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net

________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net