I think if a guy gets to that point he has the obligation to try and save his marriage first.  And no I am not saying the second obligation is to cheat.  I still say what brought the wife to the point to be that way to make him want to stray.  Unfortunately I woudl have to say it is probablly because of the husbands treatment to the wife.  I wish I could be macho about this and make it sound better for us guys but I have to be honest. 
aj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Pick one (immorality glamorized)

In a message dated 9/26/2003 1:25:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

About as much as saying the woman who intentionally set her sights on a man she knew was married bears no responsibility.  That’s what Tim (and Lowell both) were arguing.  That it’s not acceptable to say that it’s going to be the man’s fault no matter what.  It’s not a case of absolving him of responsibility or blame, but simply acknowledging that there are numerous factors in a decision to commit adultery, and the blame can never be placed totally on one person just because he happens to be male.



so the guy is just too mistreated to say no? or say get lost? or say im unhappy in this marriage lets get counceling or im outta here? the woman he cheated with is a fornicator im not arguing that but can she be responsible for the fact he cant say no?  no she cant.  the wife may not be a very good wife and shes responsible for being a bad wife. but is she responsible for his lack of ability to face their marriage problems like a man? should he go out and cheat because shes not giving him sex?  no 


________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to