The prosecutions witness testified that he (the investigator) was dubious that rape occurred based on his experience as a law enforcement officer.
so if theres no evidence then why wuld they try to bring it to trial? the prosecutor would be a laughing stock trying to get a case tried with no evidence. no political aspirations in that
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
