Well innocent of these charges. Jackie is right, he's no angel in this.
Charles Mims http://www.the-sandbox.org -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Hopper Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:28 PM To: The Sandbox Discussion List Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Breaking... Sounding more and more like a innocent guy getting nailed...... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'The Sandbox Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking... > Ok, more stuff is still leaking out of yesterday's hearing. In the > testimony the detective said that in one of her interviews with him he asked > her if he stopped when she said no, and she said yes. That could > account for the lack of his semen. (i.e. he didn't finish). Now, if > she said no (that's in question) and from her own testimony he > stopped....is that rape? > Isn't stopping what he's *SUPPOSED* to do? > > > Charles Mims > http://www.the-sandbox.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Laurie > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:19 AM > To: The Sandbox Discussion List > Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking... > > Maybe we shouldn't do this sounds like she wanted to be convinced that > it was ok..that he might care for her afterwards or something to me. I > think she got what she wanted...and then had second thoughts after he > didn't want > a relationship with her afterwards. She is young..but she obviously > had sex > before...and from what we are hearing now, quite a lot of it. > > Laurie ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
