You know  the answer to that one, without me even answering it.
 
As for the crucified bit,  if you hadn't chopped all the previous post off it would show that was in response  to you asking how he would be railroaded if certain evidense wasn't allowed at trial. *That* is what it was in response to, and in that light...makes sense. Go back and read what it was in response to, don't take the comment and apply it to something I wasn't talking about. :P  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Breaking...

In a message dated 10/16/2003 1:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Cheater or no, no one deserves to be crucified for something they didn't do. Period.....


crucified?  i wasnt aware he had been convicted and sentenced to die.     so does this mean you disagree with the fact that he should have never had sex with her to begin with?  


________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to