Cool
 

David L.

Ben Franklin:  "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt, they have more need of masters."

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Huggy
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Movie Review: Matrix Revolutions

I saw the first 20 minutes and the last hour of the movie! I like it its awwsome!
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Thursday, November 06, 2003 04:30:36 AM
Subject: [Sndbox] Movie Review: Matrix Revolutions
 
 
 
Critics by and large are unimpressed by the Matrix Revolutions hype. Joel
Siegel on Good Morning America observed that Warner Bros. went all-out on
everything except the movie itself. "I'm not saying that the Emperor is
naked, but if he shows up this morning here in Los Angeles, he's going to
catch his death of cold," Siegel remarked. In the New York Post, Lou
Lumenick cites Gertrude Stein's words about Oakland as applying to
Revolutions: "There's no there, there." "Pure smoke and mirrors," comments
John Anderson in Newsday.Jack Mathews in the New York Daily News begins his
review by remarking, "At least it's over." And those are some of the kinder
reviews. Consider by way of comparison Stephen Hunter's in the Washington
Post: "The film is a soggy mess, essentially a loud, wild 100-minute battle
movie bookended by an incomprehensible beginning and a laughable ending."
(Hunter had praised the original Matrix film.) Or take Mike Clark's blast in
USA Today: "This come-down of a series capper is so arch and pompous amid
its clanks and collisions that you can only snicker at the verbal wind that
obscures the din of marauding machinery." Chris Vognar in the Dallas Morning
News grumbles: "There's nothing like a batch of sequels to cheapen a movie's
legacy, but the decline of Matrix stock is particularly jarring."
And Manohla Dargis asks mournfully in the Los Angeles Times: "How did
something that started out so cool get so dorky?" The film does manage to
enthrall a handful of critics, among them Lisa Kennedy in the Denver Post,
who remarks: "The Matrix Revolutions leaves us with something to chew on for
years to come." And Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times concludes: "In a
basic and undeniable sense, this is a good movie, and fans who have earned
their credit hours with the first two will want to see this one and
graduate. To the degree that I was able to put aside my questions, forget
logic, disregard continuity problems and immerse myself in the moment, The
Matrix Revolutions is a terrific action achievement."
 
 
 
 
 
________________________________
 
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
 
 
.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

<<IMSTP.gif>>

________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to