bostonherald.com
Right wing revs up for `last stand' in Bay State

by Thomas Caywood
Friday, November 21, 2003

Fearing that Massachusetts could be the first gay marriage domino to fall, conservative groups around the country are setting their sights on the Bay State for a major political stand against same-sex marriage here.

``Massachusetts is our Iwo Jima. For us, it's our last stand. We're going to raise the flag,'' said the Rev. Louis Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition, based in Washington, D.C.

Sheldon said the Supreme Judicial Court's landmark finding that gays and lesbians have the right to wed could cast the institution of marriage into turmoil nationally. His group is asking its members across the country to call and write Massachusetts legislators and urge them to get behind an effort to amend the state's constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

``I feel pretty certain saying you will see groups that are concerned about this coming to Massachusetts in the coming weeks,'' said Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council in Washington, D.C.

One of the groups turning its attention to Massachusetts is the Christian Coalition, a heavy-hitting national organization of religious conservatives.

``Our people are really being galvanized over this ruling,'' said Jim Backlin, the coalition's director of legislative affairs. ``We'll be heavily involved in the grass-roots effort to influence state legislators in Massachusetts to pass a Defense of Marriage Act.''

Ronald Crews, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, said his phone has been ringing off the hook since the SJC ruling was announced.

``People across the country have been calling us saying, `I'm outraged by this decision, what can I do?' '' said Crews, who is working with other local conservative groups to plan a major rally.

The Christian Coalition and the Family Research Council, along with dozens of smaller groups, already have begun lobbying state lawmakers to push a proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages - which would trump the SJC ruling, but couldn't take effect until 2006.

Valerie Fein-Zachary of the local Freedom to Marry Coalition said her group will continue to oppose any law or constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, but she sees no reason to try to match the intense lobbying effort being mounted by conservatives.

``We fully expect the Legislature to be in compliance with the court ruling,'' Fein-Zachary said, adding, ``I would say that people from outside of Massachusetts have no business trying to influence the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision.'' Opponents of the decision, however, argue that gay marriage in Massachusetts would set a dangerous precedent and could even open a rift between states.



Copyright by the Boston Herald and Herald Interactive Advertising Systems, Inc.
No portion of BostonHerald.com or its content may be reproduced without the owner's written permission.Privacy Commitment
^**^Bethany^**^
^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^
"Keep American out of the liberal toilet.
Vote Bush-Cheney in 2004"
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net

Reply via email to