In a message dated 11/26/2003 5:20:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Yes, I'm sure that the negative publicity, and potential loss of money from donors had a huge impact on the decision to cut him from the squad.  Maybe even an overriding impact on it.  It does not change the point I've made from the beginning that a cheerleader who intentionally demoralizes the team (which *is* what happened) needs to be removed.


i never said he didnt   maybe its the definition there. i think of demoralizing as so down about it they cant play and thats not really the case here. they were right to cut him. but i dont believe it did damage to the team or made them think any less of themselves
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net

Reply via email to