I think you overestimate her
popularity. I think she has the impression of popularity because the major
networks adore her so she gets positive press. Many of the dems in the
senate are said to hold her in barely disguised contempt. Many of the dem
leaders in NY have been actively urging someone to run against her. If she
were so well liked it would seem that they wouldn't be working to get someone to
run against an incumbent.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Harder
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:00 PM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous?
If I were her I would have run this year... she would be a shoe in
for the nomination and give GWB a run for his money...
I have already said that I think that she is making a mistake.
I would disagree with you on her re-election... She is already
a very influential member of congress...
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 07:00 PM, Charles wrote:
An interesting twist to her running in '08 is that if she were to run now, even as VP she has a shot. In '08 she might not be the Senator from NY because there is a lot of dislike being generated for her throughout NY, especially in *democrat* circles. If she loses her seat in '06 it will make it more difficult for her to run in '08.<image.tiff>
Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Harder
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:48 PM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous?
We will get to test that theory in '08.
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
