The problem with blogs, especially if comments are enabled, is that any nutball (even if they are supposedly a supporter) can come along and post stuff like this and there is not really any way to moderate them other than deleting the post. And that is only if you catch the comment.
The one thing that I have noticed is that Dean allows comments on his blog Bush doesn't. From the standpoint of being a blogger I tend to wonder why this is. It's not like it's some sort of special technology and in the blogoshpere, comments are a requirement not an option. H. Dean http://www.blogforamerica.com/ G Bush http://www.georgewbush.com/blog/ -- Bill http://www.vlca.net On Tuesday 16 December 2003 06:30, Charles wrote: > Dean Supporter in Tears Over Saddam's Capture > > Though Democratic presidential front-runner Howard Dean was relatively > magnanimous in his reaction to Saddam Hussein's capture yesterday, his > supporters aren't taking the news nearly as well. > > On Dean's Blog for America Web page, supporter "Carrie" wrote yesterday: "I > can't believe this. I'm crying here. I feel that we now don't have a chance > in this election." > > Dean backer "Florida speaks" chimed in with this assessment: > > "Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism or Al Qaida or weapons of mass > destruction, so this is a pleasant PR diversion for President Bush. ... > Enjoy the little honeymoon, George. You've had a bad week until now." > > A third poster to Dean's blog complained: "I hope Governor Dean will > underscore the fact that gloating over Saddam's capture does not change the > fact that he is not OSAMA!" > > > > > > Charles Mims > > <http://www.the-sandbox.org> http://www.the-sandbox.org _______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
