At 08:51 AM 1/8/2005 -0500, Pete McNeil wrote: > >The campaigns your talking about are very aggressive - which is to say >that the sources, uri, and structure of the messages are changed >frequently, so they are going to get past filters more frequently than >other messages... I believe we are making progress developing some >generalized heuristics for these campaigns though... > >If you have a sample of something that you see as a chronic problem >then please attach it as a zip and send it to support@ so I can see if >there's something special about it. > >If you have ideas for broader black rules that you would like added to >your rulebase then please let us know... The rules that we add to the >core rulebase are designed to avoid false positives on all of the >systems we know about... often we can be much more aggressive on an >individual basis.
I would like to attack this more aggressively. The increase we've seen in spam getting through over the last week has brought on a dramatic increase in customer complaints. What different approaches might I be able to take? Thanks, -- Kirk Mitchell-General Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keystone Connect Unlock Your World Altoona, PA 814-941-5000 http://www.keyconn.net This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
